OPINION: Java - caught between the devil and the deep blue sea

Judge Whyte's ruling that Microsoft can't sell or distribute software which isn't fully compliant with Sun's Java standard is a serious blow to Microsoft as it struggles to fend off mounting accusations of bullying and coercion from supposed allies.

But as in all custody cases the good of the child - namely Java - must be the paramount concern.

Microsoft will now have to ensure its products comply with Sun's 100 per cent pure Java standard (it has already had a generous offer of help from Inprise). Analysts are clapping their hands, as Java now has a chance to mature instead of being sliced up before it reaches even a fraction of its potential.

But why is Sun so gleeful? Is it because Java's purity has been protected for the good of the user community - or because the company will retain almost total control over its development?

Not content with the outcome, Sun is now seeking damages for an unspecified amount. Would that be for emotional distress? Or is it just a simple case of gloating?

Sun may have given birth to Java, but that doesn't automatically make it a good parent. If another company or industry consortium can prove to be a better guardian, then it should be allowed to take control. Otherwise Sun's protestations that it's acting in the best interests of its users amount to nothing.

Judge Whyte's interim decision bodes well for both mother and child. But Sun must keep listening to its customers.