
By silicon.com
Published: 14 March 2000 18:19 GMT
Alabama judges have ruled Intel did not violate US anti-trust regulations in its long-running dispute with Intergraph. However, it is not clear whether the saga is now over.
The workstation manufacturer has been alleging it owns the patents on some of the technology used by Intel in its microprocessors. When Intel cut off the supply of vital information to Intergraph, the vendor cried 'wolf'.
Then when the subsequent injunction forcing Intel to feed information to Intergraph was lifted in November, Intel filed for a summary judgement. The Federal Judge in Alabama has now decreed Intel's actions have not violated US antitrust laws, because Intergraph is not an Intel competitor.
Intergraph now has to decide whether it will continue with its claim for damages in tort.
My exclusive NHS Client is seeking a Project Manager with experience of the Summary Care Records System, it's introduction and implementation. The ...
This is an excellent opportunity to join a company subsidiary of one of the worlds largest trading houses.was a record-breaking year and they are ...
Manage client power and gas positions, providing alerts when actions are required and liaising with clients to ensure that declared trading strategy ...
CIO50 2008
The silicon.com CIO50 2008 profiles the most influential and innovative tech chiefs in the UK across all industries and organisation size, from the biggest FTSE100 companies to high growth dot-com start ups and the public sector. The list was voted on by the UK CIO community and a panel of experts. Find out more in our latest special report.
Stories from the web...
Copyright ©1995-2008 CNET Networks, Inc. All rights reserved. Top of page
silicon.com Dear silicon.com... ZX Spectrum nostalgia, Mac attack, tag a bag… Reader Comments of the Week
Steve Ranger Editor's Blog: Home computing from Acorn, Amiga and Amstrad, to the ZX Spectrum Nostalgia 2.0...