You are here: silicon.com > Hardware > Servers

Servers

Blunkett shelves Snooping proposals

Controversial bill put on ice... for now or for ever?

By Joey Gardiner

Published: 18 June 2002 16:35 BST

Home Secretary David Blunkett has issued a statement explaining why a Commons debate on controversial snooping proposals has been delayed indefinitely.

Blunkett said the proposals will now be withdrawn for detailed consultation over the summer.

He said: "I recognise there is widespread concern about the current proposals to regulate how public bodies can access phone and internet records.

"It's clear that whilst we want to provide greater security, clarity and regulation to activities that already go on, our plans have been understood as having the opposite effect&I have therefore decided that it makes sense to withdraw the current proposals to allow calmer and lengthy public discussion before we bring forward new plans in this field.

"The time has come for a much broader public debate about how we effectively regulate modern communications and strike the balance between the privacy of the individual and the need to ensure our laws and society are upheld."

Blunkett has been heavily criticised for backtracking on guarantees he gave that plans to extend powers to monitor electronic communications in response to 11 September would only be used against terrorists.

It emerged last week that seven government agencies, including local authorities, NHS groups and the Food Standards Agency, were to be allowed to monitor private communications without a court order.

Last night a debate on the proposals was delayed for "parliamentary reasons", however today's statement by the Home Secretary looks like a more significant climbdown.

Over the weekend politicians from both sides came out against the proposals, with the House of Lords making it clear it would fight the new laws.

The Conservative Lord Strathclyde, who has been leading the opposition to the plans, said Labour had been forced into a humiliating retreat: "This is exactly what the House of Lords is for - to uphold natural justice and defend the freedoms of the citizen against abuse by any government.

"Had we not made clear that we would seek to defeat these outrageous proposals they would have been rammed through the Commons tonight."

Internet policy think-tank the Foundation for Information Policy Research, which has been campaigning against the proposals, welcomed the news. Director Ian Brown said: "We're very pleased with this. The government have said it won't be looked at until at least November, but we're hoping its not going to get discussed at all.

"My guess is the government is going to let this die."

  1. Zones
  2. Management
  3. Networks
  4. Software
  5. IT Services
  6. Hardware
  1. Verticals
  2. Public Sector
  3. Financial Services
  4. Retail & Leisure

  • Jobs
Clinical Research Associate (CRA) Berkshire Sponsor Company

You will supervise study conduct according to ICH-GCP requirements and all applicable laws. ROLE You will monitor clinical studies, both nationally ...

Senior Clinical Research Associate (SCRA) (CRA) Berkshire

Sponsors to track study progress and milestones; regulate quality standards; resolve logistic and practical issues, and promote the team-working ...

Senior Clinical Research Associate (CRA) (SCRA) Hull North East

Liase with CRAs and Sponsors to track study progress and milestones; regulate quality standards; resolve logistic and practical issues, and promote ...

CIO50 2008
The silicon.com CIO50 2008 profiles the most influential and innovative tech chiefs in the UK across all industries and organisation size, from the biggest FTSE100 companies to high growth dot-com start ups and the public sector. The list was voted on by the UK CIO community and a panel of experts. Find out more in our latest special report.





Quick Sitemap Links: