
UltraSparc V and Gemini won't reach market
Published: 13 April 2004 09:15 GMT
Sun Microsystems has discontinued development of two planned chips as it retrenches in a difficult era for the company.
Santa Clara, California-based Sun has stopped work on the UltraSparc V, a server chip that was supposed to come out late next year, and Gemini, a dual-core chip for web servers, a company spokeswoman confirmed.
"In order to get back to profitability, we have to make some difficult choices," the spokeswoman said.
The untimely death of the UltraSparc V and Gemini will in some ways simplify Sun's future and its throughput computing initiative, which seeks to boost data throughput in processors. Under the new strategy, Sun will concentrate on powering its servers with derivatives of the UltraSparc IV, which came out earlier this year, for the near term. One coming derivative, currently known as the UltraSparc IV+ will have an integrated high-speed cache for rapid data access.
Then, in late 2006 and 2007, the company will release Niagara, a multicore, multithreaded chip. Niagara will begin to trickle across the Sun server line. The chip is based on technology acquired from Afara but it will be compatible with Solaris, Sun's operating system. Sun also has another multicore chip, called Rock, coming out around the same time.
The UltraSparc V, which was based on a different design than the UltraSparc IV, would have required Sun and its customers to adopt, and then phase out, an entirely new chip in the course of a few years. Server customers tend to try to minimise technology transitions.
Gemini, meanwhile, was something of an anomaly. The chip, due this year, consisted of two UltraSparc II cores, a chip core Sun hasn't advanced since 1999. Partly, the chip existed as a way for Sun to demonstrate it could manufacture a two-core chip, something the company demonstrated with the UltraSparc IV.
On the other hand, the cancellation underscores the difficulties Sun has been facing in the difficult world of chipmaking. Sun processors have steadily fallen behind the performance seen in chips from IBM, Intel and others during the past several years, according to several analysts and benchmark testers. The company has also had to regularly delay products. Intel and others have delayed products too but they've been able to gain market share nonetheless.
Michael Kanellos writes for CNET News.com.
Senior Scientist Bioinformatics High-Throughput Sequencing Are you a bioinformatics scientist looking for a new and exciting challenge involving ...
Director of Clinical Project Management, Europe, Phase IIIb/IV SUMMARY Director of Clinical Project Management wanted to lead a group of Project ...
An exciting opportunity for an experienced Software Engineer to join this leading company and develop software for their range of wireless chips. ...
Agenda Setters 2009
Welcome to the ninth annual Agenda Setters poll – silicon.com's list of the top 50 most influential individuals in the technology and IT industries, from techies and CIOs to entrepreneurs and business leaders. Find out more in our latest special report.
Stories from the web...
Copyright © 2008 CBS Interactive Limited. All rights reserved. Top of page
Seb Janacek Minority Report: Mac Mini - a real nowhere machine What could it have become with a little more love and attention?
Bethan Jones Can I use a netbook as my everyday work machine? Part II silicon.com sub editor reveals whether her netbook delivered