
Extraordinary? Or ordinary?
Published: 18 February 2002 07:23 GMT
Questions have been raised about IBM's accounting practices after it was discovered that the sale of a $340m (£237m) optical business unit was not declared an extraordinary item in the company's most recent set of results.
IBM shares fell $5 on Friday following the New York Times report.
According to the paper, such transactions would normally be included in extraordinary items within a firm's balance sheet. The fact this wasn't the case and the fact IBM offset the transaction against operating costs helped Big Blue meet its earning's forecasts.
An IBM spokeswoman said the company had done nothing wrong, pointing to the fact that CEO Louis Gerstner had mentioned the transaction during the company's conference call to discuss fourth quarter results. IBM had accounted in this way since 1994, the spokeswoman added.
Liase with the Quality, CSQA and IS organisations globally to ensure that the best practices and issues around Computer systems compliance at TOPS ...
Experience with Siebel CRM and SAP accounting applications running on The successful candidate will be organised and have experience working in ...
Practices and International Conference on Harmonisation Q7a. Conference on Harmonisation Q7a. THEN READ ON AND DO NOT HESITATE TO APPLY Associate ...
CIO50 2008
The silicon.com CIO50 2008 profiles the most influential and innovative tech chiefs in the UK across all industries and organisation size, from the biggest FTSE100 companies to high growth dot-com start ups and the public sector. The list was voted on by the UK CIO community and a panel of experts. Find out more in our latest special report.
Stories from the web...
Copyright ©1995-2008 CNET Networks, Inc. All rights reserved. Top of page
silicon.com Dear silicon.com... ZX Spectrum nostalgia, Mac attack, tag a bag… Reader Comments of the Week
Steve Ranger Editor's Blog: Home computing from Acorn, Amiga and Amstrad, to the ZX Spectrum Nostalgia 2.0...